Warning that the rest of this post will not be interesting to someone not interested in art. And even then its probably going to be rough trip.
My personal theme was light. For whatever reason I walked into that museum, looked at two peices of work, and was like ' wait a minute - it's all about light! I get it!' That became my focus - every painting/image was evaluated in terms of light. How light is used to give shape, to set mood, to focus.
My favourite van gogh there was Moulin de la Galette. This picture of it sucks - but in the museum - the blue sky practically hums with energy and lightness, giving it this wonderful whimisical, airy feeling. I also really like the composition, with the stairs almost being the third wind vane.

I also spent some time looking at Monet's Le berge de La Seine 's - and his approach to light here. Monet is generally seen as being *the impressionist* of the impressionist (well, at least by his fans) influencing the others more than he was influenced by them. But his treatment of light here is a scattering of it. Its bouncing and reflecting off everything - leaves, grass, water, clouds - whereas I like it when the light serves to focus and highlight, creating 'stronger values' in my painting.

Although I have to say, there are some Monet paintings where the light seems to add an entirely different dimension to the painting. Like in this - one of his Japanese Gardens - where - it somehow seems like the painting is breathing.
I mean - what can you say about that???? Magical? Possessed? Its vibrating with energy.Rodin
The museum had a nice selection of Rodins, including
A full size of the kiss. I thought it was marble, but the website says terracotta. Don't ask me how I can confuse those two.

Rodin, who believed ""Nothing, really, is more moving than the maddened beast, dying from unfulfilled desire and asking in vain for grace to quell its passion."
The dynamic physicality of his sculptures - how they never seem at rest. Speaking of The Thinker, "What makes my Thinker think is that he thinks not only with his brain, with his knitted brow, his distended nostrils and compressed lips, but with every muscle of his arms, back, and legs, with his clenched fist and gripping toes." Like the early everest summiter who crashed his plane as high as he could and then started to climb - Rodin's figures are committed.
Degas
Degas was also fairly well represented

and even had this sketch that I've spent hours struggling with to copy - the woman's face. Is so tricky here. Degas is celebrated for many things - his ability to capture/represent movement, I love his use of colour and line, his compositions - but something that I find wonderous is his ability to sketch in the face with the minutest level of detail, in really challenging perspectives, and just utterly nail it. It's really annoying. I mean - an arm, a leg, to greater or lesser extents they are cylinders - basic shapes - that can be rotated predictably and rather easily by the mind. But the human face? Ohmygod. There are just many angles, planes, subtle shifts. Boggles the mind how he could catch it with a squiggle and a bit of shading.
This is also interesting cause you can see his mistake. The upper arm wasn't connecting to the torso properly. He just kept on going.
And the use of light! To define the shapes - from the face down to the upper torso - there isn't a single defining 'cartoon' like line. The shape is completely conveyed through shading.
I really like Degas' work. Unfortunately he was an anti-semite, and a unhappy loner.
Renoir said of him: "What a creature he was, that Degas! All his friends had to leave him; I was one of the last to go, but even I couldn't stay till the end." Never married and spent the last years of his life, nearly blind, restlessly wandering the streets of Paris.
Gratuitous Degas

Cezanne
I took a little sketch book and pencil with me, and when I do that I find it really helpful to sketch other sketches (if they are available). As a learning tool, you can see the barebones that the artist laid down. What they were thinking, even their mistakes, where they made adjustments - stuff that's hidden by days, weeks and layers in the final paintings. Here is a little sketch by Cezanne, observing his son drawing. A generational self-portrait?

But what about all the south american art??
Luckily I have tomorrow!
